Wednesday, February 27, 2008
previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (0)
Ohio debate hangover
The day after the Ohio debate, there's a lott of blog chatter about NAFTA and the whole Farrakhan imbroglio. However, I'd really like to see the mainstream media look into two big questions: 1) How, exactly, does the political leadership of Canada and Mexico feel about this whole NAFTA renegotiation business? Are they real big fans of this idea?posted by Dan on 02.27.08 at 01:41 PM Comments: Answer to a): 'No risk, but now you know how courageous I'll be as Commander-in-Chief.' Answer to b): 'The moralizing socialist Left is just as capable in wielding a whip as is the moralizing religious Right; just give me a chance to show how it's done.' posted by: a Duoist on 02.27.08 at 01:41 PM [permalink]Re: Reactions from up north. Canada's Trade Minister suggests (more here) that if NAFTA were revisted, Canada would like to rethink its energy concessions. posted by: Aldous on 02.27.08 at 01:41 PM [permalink]@a Duoist : I think you are maybe on autopilot here- moralizing against anti-semitism, how awful! Those damn "socialists", if only they would be more open minded and not criticize Farrakhan. posted by: Kurtosis on 02.27.08 at 01:41 PM [permalink]I'm up in Vancouver for some silly conference, and I'm struck by two things about the papers here. First, they seem resistant to accepting the idea that Canada is simply a province of Greater America, and so have remarkably little coverage of US issues. Second, one thing they did notice--and not favorably--was the whole "we'll scrap NAFTA" thing... lc posted by: lamont cranston on 02.27.08 at 01:41 PM [permalink]Most Mexicans would agree that we should renegotiate NAFTA (TLCAN). They feel that Mexico gave away too much and did not get enough in return. I think if the Dems are smart, they'll leave sleeping dogs lie. posted by: OpenBorderMan on 02.27.08 at 01:41 PM [permalink]Post a Comment: |
|