Friday, November 30, 2007
previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (0)
So what's going on in the Islamic justice system?
A British teacher in Sudan was convicted of "insulting Islam because her class of 7-year-olds named a teddy bear Muhammad," according to the New York Times' Jeffrey Gettleman. He has more information on the Sudanese reaction, which is a bit varied: Hundreds of demonstrators in Khartoum, Sudan’s capital, poured into the streets on Friday demanding the execution of a British teacher who was convicted of insulting Islam because her class of 7-year-olds named a teddy bear Muhammad....Time's Rob Crilly has more backstory, which suggests that much of the outrage is terribly, terribly faux: Teachers at Unity High have stood by their colleague, noting that the first complaint came only last week despite the fact that parents had been aware of the class bear's name since September.At the same time, there's another case in Saudi Arabia that's equally interesting -- because it suggests that there are fissures within the Saudi government. Click over to Charli Carpenter's post at Duck of Minerva for more -- as well as this post at the wonderfully-named Elected Swineherd. UPDATE: Lydia Polgreen has a front-pager today iin the New York Times about yet another country that has incorporated sharia into its justice system -- Nigeria. The outcome, however, is at variance with initial expectations: When Muslim-dominated states like Kano adopted Islamic law after the fall of military rule in 1999, radical clerics from the Arabian peninsula arrived in droves to preach a draconian brand of fundamentalism, and newly empowered religious judges handed down tough punishments like amputation for theft. Kano became a center of anti-American sentiment in one of the most reliably pro-American countries in Africa. posted by Dan on 11.30.07 at 11:38 PM Comments: Equally interesting? Unnamed teacher's sentence is a travesty, of course, but comparing that to fucking state sanctioned gang rape is a sick joke.There is no equivalence here. posted by: foolishmortal on 11.30.07 at 11:38 PM [permalink]The Sudanese backed off because they remembered what happened after they murdered General Gordon and didn't want the British to repeat. posted by: Useless Sam Grant on 11.30.07 at 11:38 PM [permalink]Post a Comment: |
|