Wednesday, August 29, 2007

previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (0)


The unsolved mysteries of APSA

Blogging will be light the next couple of days as your humble blogger attends this year's annual meeting of the American Political Science Association. Despite my strong preference for Las Vegas, APSA has yet to be held in that city -- we'll see if they ever get another chapter from me!!

I've blogged about this conference before. The theme of this year's post will be "unsolved mysteries." Here are the burning questions I have about APSA going forward:

1) Will Laura McKenna wear sling back heels for her 8:00 AM on Thursday panel? If she doesn't, will her panel chair be cross with her?

2) What's the worst time slot to present at APSA? The two obvious candidates are the earliest panel time (which would be at 8:00 AM on Thursday) and the latest panel time (which would be Sunday at 10:15 AM). My vote is for the Sunday slot -- the dregs of a conference are more depressing than the beginning. Plus, at least the people who have the first time slot get their obligation out of the way.

3) There is a distinguished scholar who shall remain nameless for the purposes of this posy. This scholar attends APSA on a regular basis and, as near as I can figure, displays the identical sartorial choice at every conference. He always wears a rolled-up red bandana around his neck (political scientists, you know of whom I speak, so no naming names in the comments).

Here's what I want to know: does the man have more than one kerchief? Is there a drawerful of them? Does he change it every day? Does he wear them when he's not at APSA or ISA? To quote an old Bloom County strip, "Does it get the chicks? I mean, in truckloads?"

4) As previously observed, John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt have complained about the lack of available venues for them to present their argument (whether this complaint is always sincere is another question entirely). Why, then, is there no APSA panel or roundtable devoted to their forthcoming book? Did APSA reject the panel? Was one never submitted?

Political scientists are encouraged to contribute their own APSA mysteries.

posted by Dan on 08.29.07 at 03:48 AM




Comments:

too tame!

howabout:

1. how long is mike munger's hair?

2. can you bribe a journal editior with booze?

3. is there a more pathetic scene than the apsa interview room?

4. who are the editors of the anonymous rumor blogs?

posted by: too tame on 08.29.07 at 03:48 AM [permalink]



too tame!

howabout:

1. how long is mike munger's hair?

2. can you bribe a journal editior with booze?

3. is there a more pathetic scene than the apsa interview room?

4. who are the editors of the anonymous rumor blogs?

posted by: too tame on 08.29.07 at 03:48 AM [permalink]



Considering that the conference is in Chicago, and you are obviously interested in the Israel question, why not include Finkelstein's situation as well:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070828/ap_on_re_us/controversial_professor

now, for no reason (it seems) he has been blocked from teaching, even though it is in his contract (or something).

posted by: Joe M. on 08.29.07 at 03:48 AM [permalink]



At many conferences in CS, the 8:00am slot is considered a peach of a slot...

Conference organizers tend to put one of the best papers/presentations in that slot, just to try to drag people out of bed early.

posted by: Nicholas Weaver on 08.29.07 at 03:48 AM [permalink]



This is small stuff. I know a retired professor who every day, at least for the ten years or so that I knew him before retirement, wore the exact same green corduroy suit. Good scholar, though.

posted by: William Sjostrom on 08.29.07 at 03:48 AM [permalink]



Re: Comment #5

(1)There's one in every crowd.
(2)DD has done this long enough to know there's one in every crowd.
(3)We can therefore expect that he kept the bandana-ed one anonymous, knowing fully well that another would out him.
(4)Ergo, DD is probably just hiding the fact that he must have some bone to pick with JC.

So . . . what's DD's beef with JC??????

This is how interweb rumors get started, right? :)

(This comment itself is done in full anticipation of the upcoming conference. Hooray, APSA!)

posted by: rabble rouser on 08.29.07 at 03:48 AM [permalink]



I dunno. At both extreme ends of APSA I've seen so much esprit de corps among the panelists and with the smallish audience that the panels have been great. Saturday at 8 am and Saturday at 4 pm are my votes-- everyone's dragging, and they're panelled-out.
on the other hand, the Sunday 10.15 slot means you niss the half-off sale in the book room.

mystery: will the one half-empty suitcase I brought accommodate my book purchases?

posted by: Jacob T. Levy on 08.29.07 at 03:48 AM [permalink]



I've presented in the very last time slot and I vote for it. Yup, it's pretty bleak to be talking (a) just to your co-panelists and one other person, and (b) while the staff are folding up the tables in the hall.

posted by: nelliehart on 08.29.07 at 03:48 AM [permalink]



mystery: will the one half-empty suitcase I brought accommodate my book purchases?
*********

I vote yes on this one based on my experience at this past winter's ISA in Chicago. It seems that a number of the presses have stopped actually selling their books on the spot at the conferences for tax reasons. As the editor of one of the major presses told me, their legal department asked them not to sell actual books at the conference because they weren't registered as a business in Illinois (I have no idea if this is sound legal reasoning. I'm a political scientist, not a tax lawyer. Don't shoot the messenger). So, anything you order gets mailed to you.

posted by: anon on 08.29.07 at 03:48 AM [permalink]



The great mystery of the APSA meeting is why it still happens at all. That, and why it's never in San Diego. And yes, the interview room (meat market) is the saddest place on earth. The stench of despair is overwhelming there.

posted by: msj on 08.29.07 at 03:48 AM [permalink]



The great mystery of the APSA meeting is why it still happens at all.

************

Oh, I disagree. My department pays for me to go to a great city like Chicago and go out drinking with friends from grad school and elsewhere that I see only once or twice a year. Pretty good deal.

posted by: anon on 08.29.07 at 03:48 AM [permalink]



Vegas would be fantastic for the ISA, but going to Vegas around Labor day--ugh! I am tired of Chicago, but moving the conference a bit north (to the Hyatt) is a huge improvement--the food options are many!

posted by: Steve Saideman on 08.29.07 at 03:48 AM [permalink]



I agree the APSA is a great excuse to get someone else to pay for a booze up in a big city far removed from cow town state U. (No dig, I'm in the middle of nowhere myself). But, in academic terms the APSA mainly provides vida fodder for grad students and early career types, the occasionally useful panel and a chance to question some of the 'giants' of poli sci. (I was once punched in the chest and pushed off an elevator in the Palmer House by one such luminary.) Last but not least it gives brown nosers the chance to hone their technique.

posted by: msj on 08.29.07 at 03:48 AM [permalink]




time slots: I've had 8am of day 1 for my last two conferences in a row. I'd vote for Sunday being clearly worse. It really has been nice to get my obligation out of the way up front and just focus on schmoozing, boozing, and discount book purchases for the rest of the conference.

If the only variable you're optimizing is attendance, I'd still say 10:15 Sunday is worse than 8am Thursday. I've vote 10:15 Friday as the best slot for sheer numbers.

On sartorial matters, what I always wonder is do the guys who wear a lime green shirt, plaid tie, and brown blazer _know_ what they're doing but want to make that statement for some reason, or have no clue that it creates any different impression than say, navy blue blazer with a white shirt and generic safe tie. Either is scary but with somewhat different implications.

posted by: anIRprof@somewhere.edu on 08.29.07 at 03:48 AM [permalink]



Sunday at 10:15, hands down. Less attendance and later flight out make the difference for me.

And if we're going to complain about overlooked potential host cities, when is New York going to get some love from the folks making the selections? It's been over a decade since NYC hosted APSA, and while a conference here would mean losing an opportunity to travel on my employer's dime, that loss would be more than offset by having an opportunity to show visiting friends around.

posted by: Jeremy B. on 08.29.07 at 03:48 AM [permalink]



Have to remember that we are cheap. NYC is a very expensive conference for organizers and for participants.

Yes, my attendance at panels has declined, but the experience continues to be very beneficial for career development, keeping track of developments in the field (people talk about the research outside of panels as well as at the panels), networking to develop research (organizing edited volumes, workshops, mini-conferences).

The web has made some of this stuff less necessary perhaps, but I would say the opposite. We do so much work via the net that we need this kind of opportunity to meet real people in a non-virtual kind of way.

posted by: Steve Saideman on 08.29.07 at 03:48 AM [permalink]






Post a Comment:

Name:


Email Address:


URL:




Comments:


Remember your info?