Thursday, November 17, 2005
previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (0)
Putting on the foil? Read this first.
"On the Effectiveness of Aluminium Foil Helmets: An Empirical Study", by Ali Rahimi, Ben Recht, Jason Taylor, and Noah Vawter. The abstract: Hat tip to The American Interest's Dan Kennelly for the link. posted by Dan on 11.17.05 at 12:22 AM Comments: Whoa! Talk about your conspiracy theories... Maybe now we can finally get that Ralph Nader vs Alan Keyes presidential race 'they' have been preventing. posted by: Mark Buehner on 11.17.05 at 12:22 AM [permalink]I think we have an early favorite for one of the 2006 IgNobel Prizes. posted by: HaveBeenProbed on 11.17.05 at 12:22 AM [permalink]But see http://zapatopi.net/blog/?post=200511112730.afdb_effectiveness posted by: CS on 11.17.05 at 12:22 AM [permalink]All you need to know is here: If you put a layer over your cranium, patting it down, then build the hat you can reduce the negative internal focusing effect, and reflect more EM radiation. DL posted by: Dan on 11.17.05 at 12:22 AM [permalink]The son of friends of my folks, a brilliant fellow who was also a paranoid schizophrenic who committed suicide by jumping off a bridge onto the San Diego Freeway, would wear a beekeeper's helmet for the same purpose. We once met him at the Greyhound station thus garbed. posted by: A. G. Rud on 11.17.05 at 12:22 AM [permalink]OT, but could DD get rid of the nofollow tags on links? They weren't there when I and many others commented here in the past. If you don't know what nofollow is, or you don't understand all of the implications, please do your research since it's quite a pernicious little tag. Details It can be uninstalled as described here. posted by: nofollow breaks blogs on 11.17.05 at 12:22 AM [permalink]Post a Comment: |
|