Thursday, August 7, 2003
previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (2)
What gets my neighborhood excited
The 15th edition of the Chicago Manual of Style -- published, of course by the University of Chicago Press -- will be released on August 15th. It's the first new edition since 1993. I have no doubt this will elicit groans from those under the age of 18. who over the next few years will be receiving this weighty tome as a bar/bat mitzvah, confirmation, or graduation gift. However, according to the Chicago Tribune, my neighborhood's reaction has been somewhat different:
I will admit to some eagerness as well, if for no other reason than to see how they handle citations of electronic texts. For more on this, there's a nice Q&A tool from the press, and Gary Lutz has already written a critique of the new grammar section for Slate. posted by Dan on 08.07.03 at 11:18 AMComments: Yes, but what of those of us who had just purchased the 14th edition sometime within the last year? posted by: George on 08.07.03 at 11:18 AM [permalink]At least it's better than the damned bluebook (the legal citation guide). They put out a new edition every other year, it seems. posted by: Andy on 08.07.03 at 11:18 AM [permalink]I feel your pain George--I bought mine last September when I got into the publishing business. Previously, Turabian had been adequate. posted by: James Joyner on 08.07.03 at 11:18 AM [permalink]this is an exemplar of why i love my school. /nerd, unabashed posted by: patrick woods on 08.07.03 at 11:18 AM [permalink]I think they've done a good job with website citations, but the citations of electronic databases still feel a bit clunky (do people still use things like ERIC thesedays?). posted by: Amanda on 08.07.03 at 11:18 AM [permalink]Us aspiring linguists are taught to not be such big fans of the prescriptivism represented by such a Manual, and I confess... I have been brainwashed into thinking it an enemy of sorts, LOL. I, too, would really like to see what they have in there-- not as a basis for me or for others, but to see what the "elites" and "prescribers" are accepting and not accepting! :) Language is natural, as is style, but prescribing it seems a bit... oh... artificial and Royal Academy of [insert Romance Language here] to me. Really guys, what's the big deal? :) posted by: Christian Waugh on 08.07.03 at 11:18 AM [permalink]Post a Comment: |
|