Sunday, May 18, 2003
previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (0)
Blogging, anonymity, and the paper of record
The New York Times has an amusing article on personal (as opposed to policy) blogs. My favorite part:
Good thing she doesn't talk to newspapers with national circulation, or else someone using Google could locate it in about twenty seconds. UPDATE: Today, I received an e-mail request from Ms. Allen to delete this entire post. I found this a trifle amusing -- the next sentence of the Times story quoted above runs
At the same time, I also felt some sympathy for an 18-year old who sounds a bit freaked out by the Blogosphere's focused attention on her quotidian activities. Despite the Times reporter's claim -- and her own -- it's pretty clear she doesn't want to be "found out." So a compromise: yesterday's version of this post contained an active link to Ms. Allen's blog. Given the quotation above, I suspect the source of Ms. Allen's discomfort was that link, so I've deleted it. Three concluding lessons from this: 1) Don't ever think it's possible to hide material on the Web. The "doctrine of security by obscurity" never works. 2) Being the center of attention carries negative as well as positive externalities. 3) This episode highlights another distinction between bloggers and journalists. A journalist wouldn't -- and shouldn't -- ever be able to make such a retraction. Fortunately, I'm not a journalist. posted by Dan on 05.18.03 at 02:39 PM |
|